Home  ›  Lost in Globalization International Economic Integration and Sources of Popular Discontent Review

Lost in Globalization International Economic Integration and Sources of Popular Discontent Review

Written By Saturday 16 April 2022 Add Comment Edit

Abstract

This chapter directs attending to Muslim citizens' attitudes toward regional organizations. Focusing on Arab citizens in particular, information technology concentrates on the Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Quango (GCC). The old is one of the world's oldest international and regional organizations; the latter has long been relatively unknown, despite beingness much more successful in its policies than the Arab League. The chapter argues that public opinion toward these organizations is most affected by each organisation'south performance respective to its purported aims. Therefore, it is expected that the Arab League would be perceived less favorably than the GCC. Several datasets are used to test this affiliate's hypothesis. The findings indicate that favorability toward the GCC is indeed significantly higher than toward the Arab League. For individual-level factors, the chapter finds the evaluation of the Arab League functioning is about pregnant in affecting attitudes toward the League.

Keywords

  • Arab League
  • Gulf Cooperation Council Muslim
  • Attitudes
  • Regional arrangement

Notes

  1. 1.

    Possibly belongings on to old colonial policy of "carve up and dominion".

  2. two.

    For research on public attitudes toward globalization , international trade, and international institutions, see Scheve and Slaughter (2001), Hainmueller and Hiscox (2006), Mayda and Rodrik (2005), Kaltenthaler et al. (2004), Margalit (2012), Ecker-Ehrhardt (2012), Johnson (2011), Edwards (2009), and Dellmuth and Tallberg (2015). For research on public attitudes toward regional organizations, run into Jhee (2009), Kwon (2011), and Schlipphak (2015).

  3. three.

    For research on public attitudes toward the EU, see Harteveld et al. (2013) and Boomgaarden et al. (2011), among others.

  4. 4.

    Encounter, for example, Keohane and Nye (1987) and Moravcsik (1997).

References

  • Ashforth, B. Due east., & Gibbs, B. Westward. (1990). The double-border of organizational legitimation. System Scientific discipline, 1(2), 177–194.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Barnett, M., & Solingen, E. (2007). Designed to fail or failure of pattern? The origins and legacy of the Arab League. In A. Acharya & A. I. Johnston (Eds.), Crafting cooperation: Regional institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 180–220). Cambridge: Cambridge Academy Press.

    Google Scholar

  • Boomgaarden, H. Grand., Schuck, A. R. T., Elenbaas, M., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Mapping Eu attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of Euroscepticism and Eu support. European Marriage Politics, 12(2), 241–266.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Climent, J. (2015). World terrorism: An encyclopedia of political violence from ancient times to the post-9/eleven era. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar

  • Dellmuth, 50., & Tallberg, J. (2015). The social legitimacy of international organizations: Interest representation, institutional performance, and confidence extrapolation in the United Nations. Review of International Studies, 41(3), 451–475.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Duina, F., & Lenz, T. (2016). Regionalism and diffusion revisited: From final pattern towards stages of decision-making. Review of International Studies, 42(4), 773–797.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). Cosmopolitan politicization: How perceptions of interdependence foster citizens' expectations in international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, eighteen(iii), 481–508.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Edwards, M. S. (2009). Public back up for the international economical organizations: Evidence from developing countries. The Review of International Organizations, four(2), 185–209.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Flores, T. E., & Nooruddin, I. (2016). Elections in difficult times: Edifice stronger democracies in the 21st century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Furia, P. A., & Lucas, R. T. Eastward. (2006). Determinants of Arab public opinion on foreign relations. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 585–605.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Gabel, M. (1998). Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. The Journal of Politics, threescore(2), 333–354.

    Google Scholar

  • Gulf Cooperation Council: GCC Charter. (1981). https://world wide web.files.ethz.ch/isn/125347/1426_GCC.pdf. Accessed 20 February 17.

  • Hainmueller, J., & Hiscox, M. J. (2006). Learning to love globalization: Didactics and individual attitudes toward international trade. International Organization, sixty(two), 469–498.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Harteveld, Eastward., van der Meer, T., & De Vries, C. Due east. (2013). In Europe nosotros trust? Exploring 3 logics of trust in the European Union. Eu Politics, 14(iv), 542–565.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, Yard., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., & Puranen B. et al. (Eds.). (2014). Globe values survey: All rounds - country-pooled. http://world wide web.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWVL.jsp. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.

  • Isani, M., & Schlipphak, B. (2017a). The desire for sovereignty—An explanation of EU attitudes in the Arab world. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(3), 502–517.

    Google Scholar

  • Isani, M., & Schlipphak, B. (2017b). In the Eu we trust: European Muslim attitudes toward the European union. European Union Politics, 18(4), 658–677.

    Google Scholar

  • Jhee, B. M. (2009). Public back up for regional integration in Northeast Asia: An empirical test of affective and utilitarian models. International Political Science Review, 30(1), 49–65.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Johnson, T. (2011). Guilt by clan: The link between states' influence and the legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations. The Review of International Organizations, vi(1), 57–84.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Kaltenthaler, K. C., Gelleny, R. D., & Ceccoli, S. J. (2004). Explaining citizen support for trade liberalization. International Studies Quarterly, 48(four), 829–851.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. Due south. (1987). Power and interdependence revisited. International Arrangement, 41(4), 725–753.

    Google Scholar

  • Kwon, H. Y. (2011). Globalization, cultural openness, and public preferences for East Asian economic integration in Republic of korea. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 23(1), ii–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Lawson, F. H. (1999). Theories of integration in a new context: The Gulf Cooperation Council. In Thou. P. Thomas & Grand. A. Tétreault (Eds.), Racing to regionalize: Democracy, capitalism, and regional political economy. Bedrock, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar

  • League of Arab States. (1945). Charter of the League of Arab States. http://lexicorient.com/e.o/texts/political/arab_league_charter.htm. Accessed 23 Feb 17.

  • Margalit, Y. (2012). Lost in globalization: International economic integration and the sources of pop discontent. International Studies Quarterly, 56(3), 484–500.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Mayda, A. M., & Rodrik, D. (2005). Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others? European Economic Review, 49(vi), 1393–1430.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • McLaren, L. Yard. (2002). Public support for the European Matrimony: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat? The Journal of Politics, 64(2), 551–566.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • McLaren, L. Grand. (2007). Explaining mass-level Euroscepticism: Identity, interests, and institutional distrust. Acta Politica, 42(2–iii), 233–251.

    Google Scholar

  • Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553.

    Google Scholar

  • Moorthy, R., & Benny, Thousand. (2012). Mental attitude towards customs building in Association of Southeast Asian Nations. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 557–562.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Nye, J. Due south. (1971). Peace in parts: Integration and conflict in regional organization. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar

  • Pinfari, M. (2009). Aught but failure? The Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Quango equally mediators in Middle Eastern conflicts (Crisis States Research Center Working Newspaper). https://world wide web.files.ethz.ch/isn/98212/WP45.2.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2016.

  • Scheve, K. F., & Slaughter, M. J. (2001). What determines individual merchandise-policy preferences? Journal of International Economic science, 54(2), 267–292.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Schlipphak, B. (2015). Measuring attitudes toward regional organizations outside Europe. The Review of International Organizations, x(iii), 351–375.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Schoen, H. (2007). Personality traits and foreign policy attitudes in High german public stance. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(3), 408–430.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Schulz, M., & Schulz, H. L. (2005). The Middle East: Regional instability and fragmentation. In M. Farell, B. Hettne, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Global politics of regionalism: Theory and practice (pp. 187–201). London and Ann Arbor: Pluto Printing.

    Google Scholar

  • Söderbaum, F. (2004). Modes of regional governance in Africa: Neoliberalism, sovereignty boosting, and shadow networks. Global Governance, 10(4), 419–436.

    Google Scholar

  • Solingen, E. (2008). The genesis, design and furnishings of regional institutions: Lessons from East asia and the Heart East. International Studies Quarterly, 52(2), 261–294.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Lundgren, Thou. (2016). The performance of international organizations: A policy output arroyo. Periodical of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1077–1096.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar

  • Tripp, C. (1995). The future of Iraq and of regional security. In G. Kemp & J. G. Stein (Eds.), Powder keg in the Eye Eastward: The struggle for Gulf security (pp. 133–159). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar

  • Zacher, M. W. (1979). International conflicts and collective security organisation, 1946–77: The United Nations, Organisation of American States, Arrangement of African Unity, and Arab League. New York and Toronto: Praeger.

    Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Scientific discipline, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany

    Mujtaba Ali Isani

Almost this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this affiliate

Isani, M.A. (2019). The Arab League and the GCC—Failures of Regional Arrangement in the Muslim World?. In: Muslim Public Stance Toward the International Order . Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-three-319-97328-9_4

Download citation

  • .RIS
  • .ENW
  • .BIB

  • DOI : https://doi.org/ten.1007/978-3-319-97328-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Proper noun: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-iii-319-97327-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-97328-ix

  • eBook Packages: Political Science and International Studies Political Science and International Studies (R0)

mcnamaramagentleed.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-97328-9_4

0 Response to "Lost in Globalization International Economic Integration and Sources of Popular Discontent Review"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel